Xcel Energy Services, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review Commission

¶ 61. (concurring). Although I do not join the majority opinion, I *269agree that the circuit court can adjudicate Xcel's complaint even though ACE was not a named party. I also agree that LIRC's decision and order should be affirmed on the merits. I write separately to express two concerns.

I

¶ 62. One concern is that the majority opinion repeatedly and incorrectly paraphrases Article VII, Section 8 of the Wisconsin Constitution without fully and accurately stating its terms. The majority opinion states as follows:

• Article VII, Section 8 "provides that circuit courts have jurisdiction to hear…