Legal Opinion

United States v. One 1933 Ford V-8 Coach

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided March 27, 1936No. 2849PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

The government prosecuted a libel against one Ford automobile, and judgment of forfeiture was entered upon the ground (1) that the said automobile was the personal property of one Vancil Ullom, found in the yard or inclosure where said Ullom conducted an illegal still, and subject, therefore, to forfeiture as provided in 26 U.S.C.A. § 1620; and (2) that the said automobile was used in the removal, deposit, and concealment of illegally manufactured liquor, still, and other illicit property, and therefore subject to forfeiture under 26 U.S.C.A. § 1441, which provides…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Dobbins's Distillery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. The BlackheathSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Liverpool, Brazil & River Plate Steam Navigation Co. v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Shelliday v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. National Discount CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  2. Pittsburgh Parking Garages, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  3. United States v. One Terraplane SedanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1938
  4. United States v. One Chrysler Sedan, Motor No. C77048District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. United States v. 1938 Buick Sedan, 1937 Minnesota License No. B 651-607District Court, D. Minnesota · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API