Legal Opinion

People v. Cochran

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 1998No. E019590PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.

Defendant was convicted by a jury of assault resulting in the death of a child under the age of eight in violation of Penal Code section 273ab. On appeal, defendant claims that the defendant was deprived of a fair trial because two jurors belatedly disclosed that they knew members of the victim’s family, that defendant did not have “care and custody” of the victim at the time of the offense and therefore did not fall within the purview of the statute, and that the court refused to instruct the jury under the prior version of CALJIC No. 2.90 which included the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. MirandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Hasson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. HoneycuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. PEOPLR v. AlbrittonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. People v. MalfavonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. People v. ToneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. People v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. State v. KralyIdaho Supreme Court · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API