Legal Opinion
State v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 2, 1989No. C7-88-2023, C9-88-2038, C3-88-2049, CX-88-2050, C3-88-2052 and C6-88-2093Published
1Opinion of the Court
441 N.W.2d 460 (1989)
STATE of Minnesota, Plaintiff (C7-88-2023) Respondent,
v.
Violet JOHNSON, et al., Defendants,
Leroy Varney, et al., Appellants (C9-88-2038) Petitioners (C3-88-2052),
Robert Joseph Olson, Appellant (C3-88-2049) Petitioner (CX-88-2050),
Angela Marie Doyle, Appellant (C6-88-2093).
Nos. C7-88-2023, C9-88-2038, C3-88-2049, CX-88-2050, C3-88-2052 and C6-88-2093.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
June 2, 1989.
Rehearing Denied June 30, 1989.
Nancy K. Olkon, Minneapolis, for Angela Doyle.
Robert J. Sorenson, and Daniel E. O'Brien, Public Defender's Office, Minneapolis, for Robert Olson.
Warre…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Alfred Joseph SamangoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.