Legal Opinion

Multnomah County v. Adams

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1876PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Multnomah County. This is an action brought by the county of Multnomah against W. H. Aclams, for the recovery of certain fines collected by him from defendants in state cases.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Multnomah County. This is an action brought by the county of Multnomah against W. H. Aclams, for the recovery of certain fines collected by him from defendants in state cases. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is a duly organized public corporation; that Adams is the police judge of the city of Portland, a duly organized municipal corporation; that in virtue of the incorporation act or charter, the police judge of said municipality is ex officio justice of the peace; that acting as such, he has enforced the provisions of the criminal code over which the justice’s…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, McArthur, J.:

That the legislative assembly, in creating the office of police judge of the city of Portland, had authority to invest that officer with the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace within the city limits, has been so often decided that the question must be regarded as fully settled, and such authority fully established. (Ryan v. Harris, 2 Or. 175; Craig v. Mosier, 2 Id. 323; State v. Wiley, 4 Id. 184; and Portland v. Dening, 5 1d. 160.) Nor is the principal question presented entirely new. In Ryan v. Harris, supra, we passed upon art. IV., sec. 23, subd. 1, of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ryan v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clemmensen v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Grayson v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API