Legal Opinion

Millheiser v. Wallace

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 2001No. 00-194PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

[¶ 1] Michael Millheiser and Dana Borro-ni (the buyers) purchased certain real property from Bobby J. and Bridget W. Wallace (the sellers) on a contract for deed with the expressed intention of using the property for commercial purposes. After the execution of the contract, the homeowners' association objected to any commercial use as precluded by the covenants. The buyers ceased making payments under the contract. When the court confirmed commercial use was not allowed by the covenants, the buyers sought and were granted rescission of the contract and restitution of their money…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Rissler & McMurry Co. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Hagar v. MobleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Walter v. MooreWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  5. United Pacific Insurance Co. v. Martin & Luther General Contractors, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo Bank Wyoming, N.A. v. HodderWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Granite Springs Retreat Ass'n v. ManningWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  3. KM Upstream, LLC v. Elkhorn Construction, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Allapattah Services, Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2001
  5. PENNANT SERVICE CO., INC. v. True Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API