Legal Opinion

Stapf v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1904No. 5,045PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Huntington Circuit Court; J. C. Branyan, Judge. Martin Stapf was convicted of selling liquor without a license, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHenley, J.

The appellant was charged with the crime of selling intoxicating liquor in a less quantity than five gallons at a time, without license, to be drunk in the house, garden, etc., of the said Martin Stapf. The prosecution was based on §7285 Burns 1901. A motion to quash the indictment was filed and overruled. Appellant pleaded not guilty, and a trial was had by jury resulting in a verdict of guilty, fixing a fine of $30. Appellant’s motion for a new trial was overruled.

Counsel for appellant contend that the court erred in overruling the motion to quash the indictment, because it does not aver…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schlicht v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Holt v. RockhillIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Utterback v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Stillwell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jose v. HunterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API