Legal Opinion

Ramo v. Excel Pharmacy, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFrank A. Gulotta, J.

The plaintiffs are retail pharmacists operating at Farming-dale, Long Island, who have sued the defendant, who is also a pharmacist in the same community, to permanently enjoin him from issuing S & H Green Stamps in connection with the sale of so-called fair-trade merchandise.

The plaintiffs have applied for the temporary injunction sought on this motion, on the theory that it is needed to preserve the status quo and on the further theory that their case is so clear-cut, that a trial will be a formality and that therefore they should have their relief, before it is held, to prevent irreparable…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bristol-Myers Co. v. PickerNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Automotive Electric Service Corp. v. Times Square Stores Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Libow v. Freeport Drug Shop, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API