Rodriguez v. Nelabovige (In re Kirst)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Joseph G. Rosania, Jr., United States Bankruptcy Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Fraudulent transfer law began as crimi-nal and therefore intentional fraud law.1 However, since courts struggled reaching conclusions of the subjective intent of the transferor, the fraudulent transfer law was objectified. The courts began using badges of fraud beginning with Twyne’s case2 in order to determine subjective fraudulent intent by reference to objective facts, and the law of fraudulent dispositions was ex-tended to constructively fraudulent trans-fers.
The Bankruptcy Code codifies the law of subjective and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Mancuso v. United Bank of PuebloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- In Re the Marriage of BalansonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Johnson v. HilliardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
- Valley State Bank v. DeanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- U.S. Tr. v. Beard (In re Beard)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2018
- Can IV Packard Square LLC v. Harbor Real Estate Company, L.L.C.District Court, D. Colorado · 2025
- Kelley v. HaarUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2021
- Mashburn v. GentryUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2022
- Velde v. Morrison (In re McMartin)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 2019