Legal Opinion

Ex parte Estrada

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 13, 2016No. WR-88,646-01PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONCURRING OPINION

ALCALA, J.,

filed a concurring opinion.

I concur in this Court’s judgment that grants relief to Christopher Estrada, applicant, in accordance with the habeas court’s recommendation that the record establishes a double-jeopardy violation. See Gonzalez v. State, 8 S.W.3d 640, 643 (Tex.Crim.App.2000). Applicant, however, has also pleaded ineffective assistance of trial counsel based on counsel’s failure to raise a double-jeopardy complaint in the .trial court, but the habeas court did not make findings of fact and- conclusions of law addressing that claim. I observe that, even if…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Ex Parte HerronCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Marascio, Eric ReedCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
  4. Ex parte GarciaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
  5. Hobbs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gonzalez, KimberlyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. Hubert, Lawrence IseralCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2023
  3. Pickett, Kelly C AKA Pickett, Kelly CekimberCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2023
  4. Price, Tyrone DarnellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2021
  5. SLEDGE, DONNELL v. the State of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API