People v. Branded O.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SEPULVEDA, J.
The minor appeals from a dispositional order that followed a contested jurisdictional hearing where the juvenile court found that the minor committed assault with a stun gun, a misdemeanor. (Pen. Code, § 244.5. 1 ) The minor argues on appeal that insufficient evidence supports the jurisdictional finding, because the person he shocked was not immobilized, as set forth in the statute. He also argues that the juvenile court abused its discretion in admitting expert testimony about the stun gun used by the minor. We find no error and affirm.
I
Factual and Procedural Background
On…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. Manuel G.California Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. ForrestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. ScoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- People v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re M.S.California Court of Appeal · 2021
- In re Valentin R. CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. Ramirez CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020