Legal Opinion

Clark v. Ohio River R'y Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1890PublishedCited by 6 opinions

cited: 32 W. Va. 370; 9 W. Va. 262; 15 W. Va. 362; 27 W. Va. 288; Code c. 103 s. 7; 1 Chitt. PI. (14 Am. Ed.) 214 ; 3 Wood R’y Law 1558, 1559. cited : 10W. Va. 470; 3 Rola. Pr. (Hew) 530, 531 and cases cited.

1Opinion of the Court

Lucas, President:

This was an action of -trespass on the case brought by the plaintiff against the Ohio River Railroad Company in the Circuit Court of Mason county to recover damages for an alleged failure on the part of the defendant to comply with the terms of section 14 of chapter 42 of the Code. (See Code 1887, p. 313, in regard to providing, constructing and maintaining cattle-guards, farm crossings and fences).

The declaration is as follows: “William II. Clark complains of the Ohio River Railroad Company, a corporation existing under and by virtue of the laws of West Virginia, *201which has…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wheeling v. BlackWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Blaine v. C. & O. R. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Clarke v. Ohio River R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Bolyard v. BolyardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Hoge v. Ohio River R'dWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Taylor v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Starks v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API