Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Cory Eglash

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 17, 2016No. 14-30132Published

1ConcurrenceKleinfeld, Senior Circuit Judge

I concur in Judge Christen’s opinion.

My concurrence with regard to affirming the conviction on count 4 depends on a recent decision of our court that is mistaken. Count 4 charges mail fraud based on the notice of award that the Social Security Administration mailed to Eglash. It does not refer to any mailing that Eglash made or caused another to make, in the sense required by the mail fraud statute. I agree with Judge Christen that our decision in United States v. Brown1 compels the result in this case. But Brown, I think, is a mistaken interpretation of the statute and the controlling…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. MazeSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Kann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. Benjamin F. Gay Iii, Roy M. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Robert Brown, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API