Legal Opinion

Kou Lo Vang v. Ron Angelone James Collins

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 30, 1994No. 93-15069PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

37 F.3d 1507

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Kou Lo VANG, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Ron ANGELONE; James Collins, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-15069.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 11, 1994.*

Decided Sept. 30, 1994.

1

Before: LEAVY and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges; and MARSH, District Judge.**

2

MEMORANDUM***

3

Vang argues that he does not speak enough…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sammy Lee Terrell v. R.D. Brewer, Warden Jon Morales Christopher C. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Fletcher Casey, Jr., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Samuel A. Lewis, Director, Arizona Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. Williams v. SumnerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. (PC) Sekona v. CustinoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  2. Dutcher v. FoleyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API