Scrinopskie v. Arthur Murray, Inc.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered hy
Price, J.:
This was an action to recover for the breach of a written lease covering property used as a dancing school and studio.
No service of process was had on defendants Furrey and Olson, and they are not parties to the judgment and this appeal.
The case was tried by the court without a jury in December, 1963. Judgment was rendered against Arthur Murray, Inc., a corporation, (hereafter referred to as defendant) in January, 1964, in the amount of $1,900.00, as prayed for.
Defendant has appealed. Appellate procedure is governed by the new code of civil…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Glenn Woodbury and Pearl Woodbury v. Alfred Clermont and Marguerite L. ClermontCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vickers v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Tate v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Green v. Devoe Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1970
- State ex rel. Elting v. DoerschlagSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Dear v. VedrosSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973