Legal Opinion

Scrinopskie v. Arthur Murray, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 10, 1965No. 44,151PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered hy

Price, J.:

This was an action to recover for the breach of a written lease covering property used as a dancing school and studio.

No service of process was had on defendants Furrey and Olson, and they are not parties to the judgment and this appeal.

The case was tried by the court without a jury in December, 1963. Judgment was rendered against Arthur Murray, Inc., a corporation, (hereafter referred to as defendant) in January, 1964, in the amount of $1,900.00, as prayed for.

Defendant has appealed. Appellate procedure is governed by the new code of civil…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Glenn Woodbury and Pearl Woodbury v. Alfred Clermont and Marguerite L. ClermontCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vickers v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Tate v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  3. Green v. Devoe Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  4. State ex rel. Elting v. DoerschlagSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  5. Dear v. VedrosSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API