Legal Opinion

Hatton v. . Dew

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1814PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Owing to the imperfect statement of facts contained in the transcript sent up from the court below, the Court is unable to decide satisfactorily to themselves the several points reserved in the statement.

Therefore, let a new trial be granted.

NOTE. — See Gilkey v. Dickerson, 9 N.C. 341; Banner v. McMurray,11 N.C. 93; S. v. Upton, 12 N.C. 268. So if a point be reserved by the court which does not appear on the transcript, Finch v. Elliott, 11 N.C. 61. So if it appear from the certificate of the Judge that a case was intended to be made up by him, but none comes up with the transcript.Hamilton…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Den Ex Dem. Pickett v. PickettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1831
  2. Gilky v. . DickersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1823
  3. Hamilton v. . McCullochSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1822
  4. Honeycut v. AngelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1839
  5. Finch's Executors v. ElliotSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1825

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dunett v. . BarksdaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1829

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API