Legal Opinion
WhitServe LLC v. GoDaddy.Com, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 4, 2014No. Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-00948-WGYPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG 1 District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This motion arises in a case where Whit-Serve LLC (‘WhitServe”) has sued Go-*319Daddy.com, Inc. (“GoDaddy”) for allegedly infringing two of WhitServe’s patents— U.S. Patent No. 5,895,468 (the “'468 patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 6,182,078 (the “'078 patent”). U.S. Patent No. 5,985,468 (filed Oct. 7, 1996); U.S. Patent No. 6,182,-078 (filed Dec. 2, 1999). On December 17 and 18, 2012, GoDaddy filed two motions for summary judgment on invalidity, patent marking, non-infringement, and claim construction grounds. Go Daddy’s Mot. Summ. J.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Ccs Fitness, Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation and Its Division Life FitnessCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Finisar Corp. v. DirecTV Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- I. Melbourne Greenberg, M.D. v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ancora Technologies, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2020