Federal Mogul Corporation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
63 F.3d 1572
17 ITRD 1673
FEDERAL MOGUL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee,
and
The Torrington Company, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant,
and
Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. and Koyo Corporation of U.S.A.,
Defendants-Appellants,
and
NSK LTD. and NSK Corporation, Defendants,
and
Peer Bearing Company, Caterpillar Inc., Minebea Co., Ltd.
and NMB Corporation, Defendants.
Nos. 94-1097, 94-1104.
United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.
Aug. 28, 1995.
Frederick L. Ikenson, Frederick L. Ikenson, P.C., of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee, Federal-Mogul Corp. Terence P. Stewart and James R.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Murray v. Schooner Charming BetsySupreme Court of the United States · 1804
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- SNR Roulements v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996