Legal Opinion

Federal Mogul Corporation v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided August 28, 1995No. 94-1097PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

63 F.3d 1572

17 ITRD 1673

FEDERAL MOGUL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee,

and

The Torrington Company, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

The UNITED STATES, Defendant,

and

Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. and Koyo Corporation of U.S.A.,

Defendants-Appellants,

and

NSK LTD. and NSK Corporation, Defendants,

and

Peer Bearing Company, Caterpillar Inc., Minebea Co., Ltd.

and NMB Corporation, Defendants.

Nos. 94-1097, 94-1104.

United States Court of Appeals,

Federal Circuit.

Aug. 28, 1995.

Frederick L. Ikenson, Frederick L. Ikenson, P.C., of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee, Federal-Mogul Corp. Terence P. Stewart and James R.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Zenith Radio Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Murray v. Schooner Charming BetsySupreme Court of the United States · 1804

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. SNR Roulements v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
  2. Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
  3. Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API