Legal Opinion

Marchionni v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 3, 1998No. 2419 C.D. 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAHERTY, Judge.

Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) appeals from an order of the court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court) which essentially vacated SEPTA’s order that terminated William Marchionni’s employment and remanded to SEPTA for a new hearing. We affirm.

Marchionni was employed as a maintenance manager by SEPTA. Marchionni’s employment was terminated on December 5, 1996, for directing two of his subordinates, on company time and driving company vehicles, to pick up two envelopes containing football pools and money for Marchionni. Marchion-ni…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lyness v. Com., State Bd. of MedicineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Dussia v. BargerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Stone & Edwards Insurance Agency, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. Thorp, Reed & ArmstrongCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Newcomer v. Civil Service CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown v. TucciDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Schultheis v. BD. OF SUP'RS OF UPPER BERN TOWNSHIPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. W.J. Perroz v. Fox Chapel BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. The County of Delaware v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API