Legal Opinion
Harshaw v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 17, 1921No. 2037PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 8333 (T. D. 38370).
1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge
Several importations of a commodity shown by the testimony herein to be usually referred to and known as “antimony crude” are the subjects of this appeal. The representative merchandise eon-stituently is:
Per cent.
Antimony. 70.3
Sulphur. 21.2
Iron. 1.14
Silica. Trace.
Oxygen (by difference). 7.36
The importations are from China and are produced chiefly in the district along the Yangtse and in the Province of Hunan. The appeal comes up from the port of New York. The merchandise was rated for dutiable purposes by the collector at that port as “matte containing antimony but not containing more than 10…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cowles Electric Smelting & Aluminum Co. v. LowreyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- United States v. Jacobson & Sons Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Lead Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
- Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955