Carden v. . McConnell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
„ Civil ActioN, tried before Shuford, J., and a jury, at Eall Term, 1894, of Clay Superior Couri^. From a judgment, on a verdict for defendant, plaintiff appealed. Tbe facts appear in tbe opinion of Associate Justice Furohes.
1Opinion of the Court
Furohes, J. :
This is an action by plaintiff to recover damages for slander of bis title to land. Plaintiff offered in evidence a deed from T. M. Ledford and wife to bimself, and was then introduced to prove a sale of the land to one Isbell, and on stating that the sale was in writing the defendant objected to bis speaking of tbe contents of the paper writing, and tbe objection was sustained. Plaintiff then introduced Isbell who testified that be took tbe paper writing and assigned it to one Hoffman, of Detroit, Michigan. Plaintiff then offered to prove tbe contents of the paper writing.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. . WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Pollock v. . WilcoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
- Wilson Miller v. . DerrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
3Cited by12 opinions
- Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. . SharpSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Potter v. National Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Belding v. ArcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Holloman v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.