Legal Opinion
Pineda v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 22, 2003PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered January 7, 2002, which denied plaintiffs motion for leave to file a late notice of claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiffs motion was properly denied. While plaintiffs failure to proffer a reasonable excuse for her delay in complying with the notice of claim filing requirements set forth in General Municipal Law § 50-e is not, standing by itself, fatal to her motion for leave to file a late notice of claim (see Harris v City of New York, 297 AD2d 473, 473-474 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 503 [2002]), plaintiffs…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Harris v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Ayala v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Reyes v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by8 opinions
- Heffelfinger v. Albany International AirportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Mehra v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Jenkins v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Ifejika-Obukwelu v. New York City Department of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Bialer v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.