Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Cline

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1908No. 21,090PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Hancock Circuit Court; E. W. Felt, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*455cannot be enforced by the receiver of an insolvent corporation for the benefit of the creditors. Runner v. Dwiggins (1897), 147 Ind. 238, 36 L. R. A. 645, and authorities cited; Wallace v. Milligan (1887), 110 Ind. 498; Gainey v. Gilson (1897) , 149 Ind. 58. See, also, Hale v. Allinson (1903), 188 U. S. 56, 23 Sup. Ct. 244, 47 L. Ed. 380; Evans v. Nellis (1902), 187 U. S. 271, 23 Sup. Ct. 74, 47 L. Ed. 173; Hancock Nat. Bank v. Ellis (1898), 172 Mass. 39, 51 N. E. 207, 42 L. R. A. 396, 70 Am. St. 232; Colton v. Mayer (1900), 90 Md. 711, 45 Atl. 874, 47 L. R. A. 617, 78 Am. St. 456; McLaughlin…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hale v. AllinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Wincock v. TurpinIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Hancock National Bank v. EllisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  4. Farnsworth v. . WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  5. Runner v. DwigginsIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sherman & Ellis, Inc. v. Indianapolis Castings Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Knauer v. Jonathon Roberts Financial Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Jackson v. BowieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Knauer v. Jonathon Roberts Financial Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API