Legal Opinion
In Re Kaplan
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 5, 1995No. 19-11815PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIAM H. GINDIN, Chief Judge.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
This matter comes before the court as a motion by debtors Michael Kaplan and Morris Kaplan (“debtors”) to estimate the claims of creditors Commercial Bank of New York (“CBNY”) and Midlantie National Bank (“Midlantic”) at zero pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 502(c). This court heard the motion on February 27,1994. In May 1994, Midiantic’s debt was satisfied when CBNY purchased the loan, and debtors were released from their Midlantic guaranties. Thus the motion was rendered moot as to Midlantic. A motion to supplement the record was heard on…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Nassau Trust Co. v. Montrose Concrete Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Coastal Steel Corp. v. Tilghman Wheelabrator Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Citibank, N. A. v. PlapingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Fassett v. Delta Kappa EpsilonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re CloreUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2016
- First Interregional Equity, Corp. v. First Capital Services, Inc. of Florida (In Re First Interregional Advisors Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- James Andrew BussmannUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2023