Fisk v. City of Hartford
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Suit to restrain the defendant from diverting the water of Park river into an intercepting sewer, until compensation therefor should be made to the plaintiffs as riparian and mill proprietors; brought to the Superior Court in Hartford County and reserved by that court, Elmer, J!, upon demurrer of the defendant, for the consideration and advice of this court. Judgment sustaining demurrer advised. The case is sufficiently stated in opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtTokjrahce, J.
To the original complaint in this case— which sought to enjoin the defendant from diverting, in the manner therein alleged, the flow of water into Park river— a demurrer was filed and sustained, with leave to amend. The complaint was then amended, a demurrer thereto was filed, and thereupon the questions arising upon both demurrers were reserved for the advice of this court. As the determination of the questions arising upon the demurrer to the amended complaint disposes of the case reserved, it will be unnecessary to consider those arising upon the demurrer to the original complaint.
The…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Fisk v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Town of Manchester v. Rogers Paper Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- In re Barre Water Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1900
- Chin v. Pozzi, No. Cv91-03183895 (Dec. 28, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
- Robbins v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1857