Legal Opinion

Heywood v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1957No. 8508PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Defendant railroad appeals from adverse jury verdict and judgment in action under Federal Employers’ Liability Act1 based on failure to provide a safe place to work.

Plaintiff, Robert L. Heywood, suffered the injuries complained of in a fall from a ladder while he was repairing a steam pipe in the blacksmith shop of defendant’s Salt Lake City yards. He had worked in the shops for over 30 years. As a machinist, his current assignment was that of general handy man or “trouble shooter.” On the morning of the occurrence steam was seen spouting from the pipe serving a piece of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stickle v. Union Pacific R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Hillyard v. Utah By-Products Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Cottrell v. Grand Union Tea CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Bowden v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McMurdie v. UnderwoodUtah Supreme Court · 1959
  2. McMurdie v. UnderwoodUtah Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API