Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided August 21, 1996No. CA CR 95-1023PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judith Rogers, Judge.

Appellant, Gino Hill, was convicted by a jury of debvery of a controlled substance and sentenced to twenty-five years in the Arkansas Department of Correction. On appeal, appellant argues that the trial court erred in improperly limiting appellant’s cross-examination of the State’s witness, Detective Elliott Johnson, as permitted under Rule 608(b) of the Arkansas Rules of Evidence. We agree and reverse and remand.

Appellant’s arrest and subsequent conviction resulted from an undercover drug purchase. The operation was conducted by local police and involved the use of an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MacKey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Billett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Urquhart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pryor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Farr v. HensonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.; And Aaron Marvell Foster v. Frank McMillion, Allen Jones, Carlton Pettus, Hunter Bokker, Bengi Bokker, and Zack BillingsleyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025
  4. Pryor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API