Legal Opinion

Iacovino v. Caterino

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1939No. Appeal, 216PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

After a verdict had been returned in favor of plaintiff, defendants moved for judgment n. o. v. and a new trial. The motion for judgment was granted but was reversed by this court on appeal (Iacovino v. Caterino, 332 Pa. 556), and the case returned to the court below to dispose of the motion for a new trial. Thereupon the motion for a new trial was overruled by the learned trial judge, without concurrence of any other judge of the court en banc. Judgment was entered on the verdict, and then defendants petitioned the court for a reargument of the motion for a new trial. The court en…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gail v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Lance v. BonnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  3. Giles v. RyanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Iacovino v. CaterinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Zimmerman v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bergen v. Lit Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Allegheny County v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  3. Kingsdorf v. Frank Gamburg, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. O'Hara v. ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Gimbel Bros. v. PintoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API