Legal Opinion
MATEO v. FIRST TRANSIT INC.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 28, 2024No. 3:19-cv-17302Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY MILKO V. MATEO, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 19-17302 (GC) (DEA) v. OPINION FIRST TRANSIT INC., Defendant. CASTNER, District Judge This matter comes before the Court upon Defendant First Transit Inc.’s motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff Milko Mateo’s Second Amended Complaint, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (Rule) 56. (ECF Nos. 37, 72.) Mateo opposed, and First Transit replied. (ECF Nos. 75, 81.) The Court has carefully considered the parties’ submissions and decides the motion without oral argument pursuant to…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.