Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Mullen
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided February 3, 1930PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPaw, P. J.
Two actions for damages,' brought against Miss Elizabeth Dake Wilson, R. Morris Wilson and James Cates, were tried together, by consent, before a jury in the Third Circuit Court of Davidson County, and the trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff and against the three defendants in each case.
The two actions arose out of a collision between two automobiles at the intersection of Union street and Sixth avenue in the City of Nashville, about 8:30 o ’clock in the evening of October 1, 1928. One of the ears involved in the collision was a Chevrolet sedan owned by J. B. Mullen and driven at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hale v. JohnstonTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
- Heidle v. BaldwinOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Burdette v. HensonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
- Hughes v. Hudson-Brace Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Meinhardt v. VaughnTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wright Ex Rel. Wright v. WrightTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- Wilson v. MoudyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
- Parks v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
- In Re WretlindSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Maxwell v. KirkpatrickCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.