Legal Opinion

Hikita v. Nichiro Gyogyo Kaisha, Ltd.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 2004No. S-10612PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

I. INTRODUCTION

The superior court imposed litigation-ending sanctions against Alaska Foods, Inc., and *459Takehiro Hikita (collectively Alaska Foods) for failing to produce pretrial discovery. We reversed the sanctions order because the superior court did not explicitly consider lesser alternative sanctions. After considering and rejecting lesser alternatives on remand, the superior court reimposed its original sanctions order. We affirm, concluding that the superior court did not abuse its discretion.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

This is the fourth time this case has come before us and the…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sykes v. Melba Creek Mining, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Triton Coal Co. v. Husman, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. NarrowsAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Hikita v. Nichiro Gyogyo Kaisha, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Alaska Foods, Inc. v. Nichiro Gyogyo Kaisha, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harrod v. State, Dept. of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  2. International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. v. BissonetteAlaska Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API