Durham v. Peabody Coal Co.
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
These appeals concern the consensus procedure that KRS 342.316 mandates in coal workers’ pneumoconiosis claims. In each case, an ALJ dismissed the worker’s claim, holding that he failed to rebut a consensus of three “B” readers that the best quality x-ray in evidence was negative. The Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed. The Court of Appeals affirmed and rejected the workers’ argument that the statute violates the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution and Sections 1, 2, and 3 of the Kentucky Constitution by treating miners who suffer from coal workers’…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Special Fund v. FrancisKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
- Wolf Creek Collieries v. CrumCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1984
- Smyzer v. BF Goodrich Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
- Magic Coal Co. v. FoxKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Vision Mining, Inc. v. GardnerKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
- Miller v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2009
- Cain v. Lodestar Energy, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2009
- Campbell v. Hauler's Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2010
- Durham v. Peabody Coal Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.