Legal Opinion

Cassidy v. Sullivan

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1906No. 14,031PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from tbe district court for Holt county: James J. Harrington, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Albert, C.

This is an appeal from a decree enjoining the defendants from maintaining a fence on an alleged public road. The defendant Babcock owns the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of a certain section of land, and his codefendant owns the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of the section adjoining on the west. The road extends north and south on the section line between the two forty-acre tracts. That the defendants, a short time before the suit was commenced, erected a fence on the road is not disputed; the only controversy being the sufficiency of the evidence to show…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. AbbottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  2. Streeter v. StalnakerNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Rees v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Alden Coal Co. v. ChallisIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Van Wanning v. DeeterNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  2. City of McCook v. Red Willow CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Hughes v. VealSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Kendall-Smith Co. v. Lancaster CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Lyons v. MullenNebraska Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API