Button v. Olson
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FULL TEXT
BY THE COURT.
This is a suit in equity to compel the specific performance of a land contract for an exchange of improved real property, which contract was entered into by the defendants, and which they refuse to cany out.
The defendants admit the signing and delivery of the contract, but claim it was obtained through the misrepresentations of a real estate agent who, the plaintiff claims, acted for both of the parties to the contract.
Assuming that the agent was acting' for both of the parties, although from the iecord we are inclined to the opinion that he was really acting' for the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Morgan v. HardyNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by2 opinions
- Garl v. MihutaOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
- Slusser v. BrillhartOhio Court of Appeals · 1958