Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bingham v. Williams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 8, 1953No. 35258Published

1ConcurrenceDavison, Justice

(specially concurring).

Although I concur in the result reached by the majority of the court in the opinion adopted in the above styled and numbered cause, and, although I am not in disagreement with the general line of reasoning therein, I am firmly of the opinion that the trial court had no jurisdiction over the nonresident defendants, ab initio. I think the motion of the defendants to quash issuance and service of summons, based upon jurisdictional grounds, should have been sustained prior to trial, and, for that reason, I feel that I should give the reasons for that conclusion.

*756Succinctly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Franklin Drilling Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. GrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Summers v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Texas Co. v. AlredSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Texas Company v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API