Bingham v. Williams
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1ConcurrenceDavison, Justice
(specially concurring).
Although I concur in the result reached by the majority of the court in the opinion adopted in the above styled and numbered cause, and, although I am not in disagreement with the general line of reasoning therein, I am firmly of the opinion that the trial court had no jurisdiction over the nonresident defendants, ab initio. I think the motion of the defendants to quash issuance and service of summons, based upon jurisdictional grounds, should have been sustained prior to trial, and, for that reason, I feel that I should give the reasons for that conclusion.
*756Succinctly…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Franklin Drilling Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. GrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Summers v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Texas Co. v. AlredSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Texas Company v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936