Legal Opinion
Steinhilber v. Barsell Steinhilber
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided October 18, 2019No. 8:19-cv-00370Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA ANDREW STEINHILBER, Petitioner, 8:19CV370 vs. MEMORANDUM SARAH RACHEL BARSELL AND ORDER STEINHILBER, Respondent. Petitioner Andrew Steinhilber filed a “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” (filing no. 1) on August 23, 2019 and paid the $5.00 filing fee. Upon preliminary review of the petition, the court determines that this matter must be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. I. SUMMARY OF PETITION Petitioner alleges he is the biological father of two minor children, M.S. and O.S., and Respondent Sarah Rachel Barsell…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re BurrusSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Rasul v. BushSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Lehman Ex Rel. Lehman v. Lycoming County Children's Services AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Walter J. Drewes, Cross-Appellant v. Brenda B. Ilnicki, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Missouri Division of Family ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997