Legal Opinion

McRackan v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 24, 1909PublishedCited by 1 opinion

ActioN tried before Lyon, Jand a jury, at July Term, 1908, of Columbus. Plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

Tbis action was brought, under Revisal, sec. 2631, to recover the penalty for refusing to receive a box of goods tendered by the plaintiff in person to tbe defendant, at Clarendon, N. C., for shipment to Whiteville, N. C. The box of'goods belonged to Samuel I. Epstein, who had delivered them to the defendant, at Clarendon, for shipment to Clio, S. C., and received a bill of lading therefor. While the box' was in the defendant’s possession, at Clarendon, it was attached in an action brought by Broom & Mayer against Samuel I. Epstein. The plaintiff testified: “I had no interest in these…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Goldsboro.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Stone & Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Rollins v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Cardwell v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Cunningham v. PorchetCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burlington Lumber Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API