Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. Halligan

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1942No. 31271PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

This is an appeal from an award of attorneys’ fees> to' Shuman & Overcash, attorneys at law, and also from an order assessing the costs of the second sale had in a partition proceeding carried on under sections 20-2170 to 20-2199 and 20-21,100 to 20-21,111, Comp. St. 1929.

As to the first contention of the appellants, it is, substantially, that “attorneys’ fees allowable under the statutes in partition actions for plaintiff’s counsel are those in amicable proceedings,”' and that within this principle the attorneys’ services performed by pláintiff’s attorneys were not performed in an “amicable…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Woodard v. BairdNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Windle v. KellyNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Johnson v. EmerickNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Mabry v. MuddNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Nielsen v. NielsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lorenz v. LorenzNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Baskins v. KrepcikNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Baskins v. KrepcikNebraska Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API