Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dotson v. Ritchie

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 2, 1947No. 4-8203Published

1DissentRobins, J.

I respectfully dissent. In my opinion the lower court properly dismissed appellant’s petition.

Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy and is never granted unless the party applying therefor has a clear right thereto and has no other adequate remedy in the premises. Ex Parte Trapnall, 6 Ark. 9, 42 Am. Dec. 676; Basham v. Carroll, 44 Ark. 284; Cotton v. Steel, 95 Ark. 623, 129 S. W. 1198; Snapp v. Coffman, 145 Ark. 1, 223 S. W. 360; Jones v. Adkins, 170 Ark. 298, 280 S. W. 389.

As I view the matter, appellant failed to show any right to mandamus, because he was, in effect, asking that the writ be…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Arberry v. BeaversTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Miller v. TatumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  3. State Ex Rel. Latta v. MariannaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  4. Garland Power & Development Co. v. State Board of RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  5. Rolfe v. Spybuck Drainage District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1911

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API