Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Associated Industries of Kentucky v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1995No. 95-SC-53-TGPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partStephens, Chief Justice

It is a well settled and often repeated principle in Kentucky jurisprudence that “[i]n order to have standing to bring a lawsuit, the plaintiff must have a judicially recognizable interest in the subject matter of the suit and a present or substantial interest therein.” Housing Authority of Louisville v. Service Employees International Union, Local 557, Ky., 885 S.W.2d 692, 695 (1994). In recognition of'the subjective nature of this standard, we have held that “[t]he issue of standing is one which is to be decided on the facts of each case.” Rose v. Council for Better Education, Inc., Ky.,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rose v. Council for Better Education, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Commonwealth v. WassonKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Kentucky Harlan Coal Co. v. HolmesKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Kentucky Milk Marketing & Antimonopoly Commission v. Kroger Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Housing Authority of Louisville v. Service Employees International Union, Local 557Kentucky Supreme Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API