Legal Opinion

Solomon v. Royal Art Glass Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 15, 1913PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, first district, entered in favor of the plaintiff for $171.50, upon a verdict of a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff, an infant, between the age of fourteen and sixteen years, while employed in the defendant’s factory. It was proved that the plaintiff entered the defendant’s employ when he was thirteen and one-half years old. After working for a few months as an errand boy he was put to work as a glass cutter and later on as a bender of glass, at which occupation he was injured by the dropping of a piece of .hot glass into his trousers, which severely burned his thigh, leg and foot, and confined him to bed for several…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marino v. . LehmaierNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Koester v. . Rochester Candy WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Kircher v. Iron Clad Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  4. Dragotto v. PlunkettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vincent v. Riggi & Sons, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API