Legal Opinion

State v. Chihanski

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1995No. Cr. 950143PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

Joanne Chihanski appeals from a Grand Forks County District Court judgment of conviction entered upon a jury verdict finding her guilty of driving under the influence. We affirm.

Chihanski argues on appeal the trial court erred when it denied her motion to suppress a statement made without benefit of Miranda warnings. She raises two issues for our consideration: (1) whether the statement “no” made before taking an Intoxilyzer test and in response to a police officer’s question “have you put anything in your mouth since the time of arrest” is testimonial, thus requiring Miranda…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Moser v. North Dakota State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Bickler v. North Dakota State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. WinklerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. SyvertsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Buchholz v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Turner v. R.W.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. City of West Fargo v. HawkinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API