State v. Chihanski
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
Joanne Chihanski appeals from a Grand Forks County District Court judgment of conviction entered upon a jury verdict finding her guilty of driving under the influence. We affirm.
Chihanski argues on appeal the trial court erred when it denied her motion to suppress a statement made without benefit of Miranda warnings. She raises two issues for our consideration: (1) whether the statement “no” made before taking an Intoxilyzer test and in response to a police officer’s question “have you put anything in your mouth since the time of arrest” is testimonial, thus requiring Miranda…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Moser v. North Dakota State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Bickler v. North Dakota State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. WinklerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. SyvertsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Buchholz v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Turner v. R.W.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- City of West Fargo v. HawkinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.