Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Mitchell

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 21, 2004No. B168243Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

ORTEGA, J., Concurring and Dissenting.

I agree with the majority that Mitchell should receive Penal Code section 2933 prison credits from his January 29, 2003, formal exclusion from the California Rehabilitation Center (CRC) until his June 10, 2003, sentencing. (All further undesignated section references are to the Penal Code.) Thus, I concur with the holdings in sections A and B of the majority opinion. However, Mitchell should receive neither section 4019 nor section 2933 credits from his January 8, 2003, CRC arrival until his January 29, 2003, formal CRC exclusion. Therefore, I dissent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. NublaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. People v. LizarragaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API