Legal Opinion

Musick v. Kansas Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 7, 1992No. 66,048PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Briscoe, C.J.:

The Department of Revenue appeals, from the district court’s finding that Craig Musick’s prior uncounseled conviction of driving while under the influence could not be used as a basis for extending the period of his driver’s license suspension under K.S.A. 1989 Supp. 8-1014.

Musick was arrested for DUI on June 23, 1985, ánd entered into a diversion agreement on July 16, 1985. He was not represented by counsel when he entered into the diversion agreement. In determining whether the Depártment, will suspend or restrict an individual’s driving privileges for test .refusal, test…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Baldasar v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Director of Taxation v. Kansas Krude Oil Reclaiming Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. State v. BoosSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  5. Younger v. MitchellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Patterson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  2. State v. LikinsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  3. State v. HamannOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API