Legal Opinion

United States v. Brumfield

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 1, 1999No. 97-30163, 98-30114PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUPLANTIER, District Judge:

Before us are two consolidated appeals by Noel Brumfield from two district court orders declaring that he had not purged himself of an earlier civil contempt judgment resulting from his failure to comply with the court’s order that he produce certain documents and transfer designated property to a purchaser selected by the United States. For the following reasons we conclude that the appeal of only one of the orders was timely, and we affirm that order. The district judge did not abuse his discretion in concluding that Brumfield did not purge himself of the civil…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Santibanez v. Wier McMahon & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  2. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Wayne L. YashinskyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena John Doe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. United States Abatement Corp. v. Mobil Exploration & Producing U.S. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Gerald HallahanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. ConcesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Anderson Dundee 53, L.L.C. v. TerzakisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. United States v. Ronald ConnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  4. Anderson Dundee 53 L.L.C. v. Terzakis Supplemental OpinionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. United States v. ConcesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API