Legal Opinion

Heathington v. Heathington Lumber Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 3, 1967No. 7729PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORTHCUTT, Justice.

The pleadings upon which plaintiff, appellant, Floyde Heathington, went to trial sought to establish himself as a partner in the lumber business in Muleshoe, Texas. The business was first named Heathington Cash Lumber Company and later changed to Heathington Lumber Company, Inc. He alleged the partnership was between himself and his older brother, Fairris Heath-ington, with the latter owning ⅜ interest and appellant a ½ interest. The lumber company having been incorporated in June of 1964, the suit was against the corporation, the surviving widow, Mrs. Hattie Faye…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Howell v. BowdenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  2. Heathington v. Heathington Lumber CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  3. Jones v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Thompson v. Van HowelingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Easley v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Woodruff v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Ramseyer v. RamseyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Ross v. WalshCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. Gano v. JamailCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Boutell v. HillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API