Legal Opinion
Russell v. DiFuria
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Motion for a new trial in an action in ejectment.
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
The defendant DiFuria was the owner and is in possession of the premises described in the complaint. The plaintiff is the holder of a tax deed of the same premises executed and delivered to her on December 9,1911, by the county treasurer of Onondaga county. This deed was recorded on the same day.
The case was tried at the Onondaga Trial Term on October 23,1913. The tax deed referred to was offered and received in evidence over the objection of the defendants. The plaintiff then proved a proper demand for possession of the said premises and rested. The court excluded all evidence offered by the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Meigs v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Cromwell v. . MacLeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Ensign v. . BarseNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Joslyn v. . RockwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Bryan v. . McGurkNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of New Rochelle v. Echo Bay Waterfront Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Budd v. FrancoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Cavitt v. SeirsonMontana Supreme Court · 1946