Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. Arbella Mutual Insurance

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided December 18, 2009Published

1Opinion of the CourtSwan, J.

Michael H. Kaplan, D.C. (“Kaplan”) commenced this action against Arbella Mutual Insurance Company (“Arbella”) seeking payment under G.L.c. 90, §34M of personal injury protection (“PIP”) benefits for chiropractic services he provided to Arbella’s insured. The trial court allowed Arbella’s Mass. R. Civ. R, Rule 56 motion for summary judgment based on the failure of Arbella’s insured to cooperate by submitting to an independent medical examination (“IME”) ,1 Kaplan has appealed that summary judgment ruling.

*309In moving for summary judgment, Arbella “assume [d] the burden of affirmatively…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Augat, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Nashua Corp. v. First State InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  4. Hodnett v. Arbella Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996
  5. Knight v. CNA Insurance CompaniesMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API