Seewald v. Schmidt
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in tbe district court for Waseca county to recover $325 for injury to plaintiff’s borse. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion. Tbe case was tried before Childress, J., wbo when plaintiff rested denied separate motions on tbe part of defendants' to dismiss the action, and a jury which returned a verdict for $250 in favor of plaintiff. From an order denying their separate motions for a new trial, defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Dibell, C.
Separate appeals by tbe defendants from orders of tbe court denying their motions for a new trial after a verdict for tbe plaintiff.
Tbe defendants Madsen Brothers were engaged in tbe construction of a building in tbe city ef Waseca fronting at tbe west on Second street and extending easterly to within a few feet of an alley some 20 feet in width. This alley extended through tbe block from the street at tbe south'to tbe one at tbe north. Tbe building in process of erection was toward tbe north of the block. In doing their work tbe defendants were using a concrete mixer operated by a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- City of Winona v. BotzetCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Parker v. Mayor of MaconSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
- Lincoln v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Kiley v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
- Cain v. . the City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Briglia v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Fitzgerald v. Village of BoveySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Kommerstad v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915