Legal Opinion

Kirchner v. Wilson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1996No. S-94-912PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

This is a negligence action in which the vehicle operated by the defendant-appellee, Larry J. Wilson, collided with the rear of the automobile operated by the plaintiff-appellant, Leroy Kirchner. The district court determined as a matter of law that Wilson was negligent, that such negligence was the proximate cause of the collision, and that Wilson was liable for any damages Kirchner sustained as a proximate result of said collision. The jury thereafter returned a verdict in favor of Kirchner, and the district court entered judgment thereon. Being dissatisfied with the amount of the judgment,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barks v. Cosgriff Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. David v. DeLeonNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Kaspar v. SchackNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Burns v. MetzNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State on Behalf of Joseph F. v. RialNebraska Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Tapp v. Blackmore Ranch, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Snyder Ex Rel. Snyder v. Contemporary Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Gustafson v. Burlington Northern RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Ketteler v. DanielNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. GlantzNebraska Supreme Court · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API